My Alternatives to Big Tech Social Media Networks

Image/photo

This webpage has been created for those seeking alternatives to Big Tech run Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, etc. There are many reasons for people seeking such alternatives:

  • They can be dissatisfaction with the terms and conditions that must be complied with
  • Or that a particular network is a walled garden not allowing outside viewing
  • Or they want to separate their work/family/social lives
  • Or a dissatisfaction with how their metadata or posts are shared with advertisers or third parties
  • Or that the feed algorithms are manipulated to show adverts or other posts they don’t follow
  • Possibly they’ve been banned already from a network
  • Or that a large centrally hosted service is under scrutiny from their government
  • Or possibly certain such sites are even censored or banned in their country

The list of reasons is actually endless, and the aim of this page is to highlight a few worthy alternatives to consider. This list of alternatives is not intended to be a list of everything that exists (there are hundreds and hundreds) but the one’s I’m using fairly actively still, and I will try to highlight any particular aspects that stand out for me. My preference has been to look at networks that work cross-platform on desktops and mobile, are open source, and decentralised.

An important thing to realise is that where most of your friends and family may be using say Facebook, you can expect that the majority of them will not just follow you to a new site. Also, many alternative sites do not request, or require, an e-mail address or phone number to register, so you can expect that finding any real-life friends there is not always so easy. What you will usually find, is lots of people that are discussing their passions and interests, whether those be gardening, programming, privacy, surfing, stamp collecting, or whatever. So be warned you’ll probably meet new interesting people online without having any idea whether they live next door to you, in a distant country, or have three arms and a green head.

I’m going to clarify a few terms here that will make it easier to understand what type of network is being listed here. The reason is that many are very different to the concept of just typing in a web URL, landing at the main site, and then just seeing everyone who is there. Many of these sites have no personal profile at all that you follow, and some have no server service at all based in any country.

You can also view my playlist at https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdSTEdM8Pkf0LQS0RF_QsSPw9MoDr8hbD that has videos examining many alternative social networks that I use.

Terminology

Open SourceThe source code for the service is available to be studied and modified which gives insight into whether, and then how, algorithms are used, whether there is any tracking, how passwords and user data is stored, how access permissions are managed, and whether there are any other hooks or API’s which could share data externally.

Apart from MeWe and YouMe Social below, all other networks are free and open source software and self-hosted. Which means no company advertising or sharing of user information, with those sites being self-funded for hosting or relying on donations.
Blog TypeMicroblogging – Twitter type posts limited to usually 500 or fewer characters.

Macroblogging – Much longer length posts with ability to embed images, videos, and formatting of text.
Profile vs GroupsFollowing a profile shows all that profiles posts no matter what they post about. This can be ideal for following friends and family.

Following a group/channel is more focussed on a specific topic/hobby that you are interested in. Consider this option for new networks to find individuals with similar interests.
Centralised (C)The whole service is accessible using a single web URL (eg. like www.facebook.com) which usually means legal jurisdiction is based in a single country, and there is one set of terms and conditions. Such services can be censored or disabled through access to the ownership of that entire service. It does happen that server loads could be distributed across many physical servers, even in different countries. In many cases these tend to be walled gardens (you register to login and read anything and participate), and if you leave the service, your contacts can no longer follow you or interact with you.
Decentralised (D)The service can be independently installed, managed and accessed from different servers. This implies each server instance (or pod) is independently managed, under legal jurisdiction of the country it resides in, and can have tailored terms and conditions for each separate server. You would choose the social network and then find a specific server/pod/instance where you register and participate.
Federated (F)Simplistically this is two or more decentralised services which interconnect to pass messages, posts, likes, comments, follows, etc between the services. Users on different services will usually have usernames with a different suffix for each service instance ie. similar to how one e-mail user could have an address username1@gmail.com whilst the other has username2@yahoo.com. Functionality is transparent though for all users. A federation need not only be across the same social network service, but when a common open protocol is used (eg. ActivityPub), different types of social networks can fully interconnect (eg. PixelFed with Mastodon) forming a large federated network.
Peer-To-Peer (P2P)These are decentralised type networks, with each computer itself being the node (doing the actual hosting) and exchanging posts, likes, follows, comments with all nodes it has connected to (ie. others whom you have befriends/connected to). Because there is no central service owner or website, it is almost impossible for anyone to disable or have any legal jurisdiction over. It is also the most difficult for users to connect to other users, and also means installing local client software, and ensuring that your computer is allowed to connect to other strangers’ computers (which is why many of these users make use of Tor and other means to obscure their IP addresses. It also means one or more of your peered connections needs to be online for your posts to be received, and for you to receive posts and comments. Scaling though is not an issue as there are zero hosting costs, and it only depends on how much space is available on each peer’s computer.

Social Networks

For more on general alternatives to Big Tech sites and services, you can also visit my page at https://gadgeteer.co.za/my-alternatives-big-tech. I also maintain a categorised list of hundreds of excellent free and open source software products at https://gadgeteer.co.za/opensourcesoftware.